Comments on: Maxlength HTML attribute for domain objects http://www.javathinking.com/2008/03/maxlength-html-attribute-for-domain-objects/ Java and software development related thoughts Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:59:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Nitin http://www.javathinking.com/2008/03/maxlength-html-attribute-for-domain-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1715 Nitin Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:00:58 +0000 http://www.javathinking.com/?p=70#comment-1715 Thanks for showcasing this example. But, I guess this doesn't works for nested level fields. For ex. Class A has a instance of Class B as a field b, which in turn has field String title. Then in that case following line will not work, until 'b' is already initialized maxlength="${A.b.constraints.title.getMaxSize()}" Thanks for showcasing this example. But, I guess this doesn’t works for nested level fields.
For ex.
Class A has a instance of Class B as a field b, which in turn has field String title. Then in that case following line will not work, until ‘b’ is already initialized
maxlength=”${A.b.constraints.title.getMaxSize()}”

]]> By: David Marko http://www.javathinking.com/2008/03/maxlength-html-attribute-for-domain-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-296 David Marko Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:52:31 +0000 http://www.javathinking.com/?p=70#comment-296 'Command Objects' is very unusual naming. :-) They should call it Forms or something. ‘Command Objects’ is very unusual naming. :-) They should call it Forms or something.

]]> By: paul http://www.javathinking.com/2008/03/maxlength-html-attribute-for-domain-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-295 paul Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:37:40 +0000 http://www.javathinking.com/?p=70#comment-295 Ah, thanks. I expect it will work with command objects since constraints are defined in exactly the same way. Ah, thanks. I expect it will work with command objects since constraints are defined in exactly the same way.

]]> By: David Marko http://www.javathinking.com/2008/03/maxlength-html-attribute-for-domain-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-293 David Marko Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:28:21 +0000 http://www.javathinking.com/?p=70#comment-293 I mean this Grails feature http://grails.org/doc/1.0.x/guide/6.%20The%20Web%20Layer.html#6.1.9%20Command%20Objects Its like the domain object except it serves as form. Details are in docs. I mean this Grails feature
http://grails.org/doc/1.0.x/guide/6.%20The%20Web%20Layer.html#6.1.9%20Command%20Objects

Its like the domain object except it serves as form. Details are in docs.

]]> By: paul http://www.javathinking.com/2008/03/maxlength-html-attribute-for-domain-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-291 paul Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:49:07 +0000 http://www.javathinking.com/?p=70#comment-291 David, I'm not sure what you mean here - it makes sense with Domain objects since they are populated with constraints such as maxSize. What do you mean by command objects? David, I’m not sure what you mean here – it makes sense with Domain objects since they are populated with constraints such as maxSize. What do you mean by command objects?

]]> By: David Marko http://www.javathinking.com/2008/03/maxlength-html-attribute-for-domain-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-290 David Marko Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:04:04 +0000 http://www.javathinking.com/?p=70#comment-290 It makes absolute sense. Especially when one is using command objects with some specific settings. using this aproach one can avoid inconsistency . is it working with Command Objects as well? David It makes absolute sense. Especially when one is using command objects with some specific settings. using this aproach one can avoid inconsistency . is it working with Command Objects as well?

David

]]>