<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redirecting javathinking.com to www.javathinking.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.javathinking.com/2009/04/redirecting-javathinkingcom-to-wwwjavathinkingcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.javathinking.com/2009/04/redirecting-javathinkingcom-to-wwwjavathinkingcom/</link>
	<description>Java and software development related thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.javathinking.com/2009/04/redirecting-javathinkingcom-to-wwwjavathinkingcom/comment-page-1/#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 00:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javathinking.com/?p=314#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>Make sure to use uniform root URLs throughout your site and 301 (permanent) redirects so that your Google ranking isn&#039;t penalised.

I&#039;ve also noticed the general opinion on the internet (which is never wrong!) suggests that Google gives &quot;www.&quot; sites a slightly higher ranking.  I guess it makes sense, given that traditionally the first part of the URI was used to indicate the protocol (&quot;ftp.&quot; &quot;www.&quot; &quot;gopher.&quot; etc).  Now that&#039;s showing my age.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make sure to use uniform root URLs throughout your site and 301 (permanent) redirects so that your Google ranking isn&#8217;t penalised.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also noticed the general opinion on the internet (which is never wrong!) suggests that Google gives &#8220;www.&#8221; sites a slightly higher ranking.  I guess it makes sense, given that traditionally the first part of the URI was used to indicate the protocol (&#8220;ftp.&#8221; &#8220;www.&#8221; &#8220;gopher.&#8221; etc).  Now that&#8217;s showing my age.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.javathinking.com/2009/04/redirecting-javathinkingcom-to-wwwjavathinkingcom/comment-page-1/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.javathinking.com/?p=314#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s funny, I would rather do the opposite. Drop the infamous www from the url, instead of adding it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny, I would rather do the opposite. Drop the infamous www from the url, instead of adding it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

